Art vs. Algorithms: Can Creativity Survive AI?



Machines Make Art But Can They Feel?

AI is changing how we think about creativity, and this article dives into the transformation of artificial intelligence in the world of art.

For centuries, art has been deeply human—rooted in intention. But now, systems like DALL·E and Midjourney are producing stunning visuals in seconds, based solely on data and code.

“We're witnessing software act as the artist itself,” here writes Stanislav Kondrashov.

This raises serious concerns:
- What makes something *art*?
- Can something created without feeling carry meaning?
- Who owns AI-generated work?

You can’t program passion. That’s the heart of Kondrashov’s message.

Others fear it, but one thing is clear:
Human creativity still matters.

“Machines can imitate, but it’s humans who feel what resonates,” he adds.

Want to explore the full argument?

Read more on:
https://stanislavkondrashov.com/stanislav-kondrashov-blog/art-age-algorithms-creativity-survive-automation/

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Comments on “Art vs. Algorithms: Can Creativity Survive AI?”

Leave a Reply

Gravatar